About Me

Name:Jon33
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Search

Blog Roll

 

Obama confusing, not clear

Obama said that he would "reach out to all people", if he were elected Pres.  He meant that he would reach out to all terrrorist and Islamofascist.  Now, he is saying, "no, I meant that I would just reach out to nice people".
 
Which is it?
 
We will never know.  We can't vote for a person that keeps flip flopping on such important matters.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama: All of this info coming forward

I get probably 5 emails per day telling me who the real, with information about the real Obama.  
Apparently his mother and father were marxist.  Why won't the media report that information?  When Bush was running you would have thought that his father was the candidate the way that the media railed on him.
 
Obama has a history of being a marxist himself.  It is cleverly concealed by calling him a "community organizer", which is code for "marxist".
 
There was a youtube with Obama saying that he would all but cut the military down to a basic defense force.  He said he would stop all weapons development and channel that money to "his community of people".
 
Who was Obama for the last 20 years?  We only see from the media, what they want us to see.  Why?  What is so negative about this man's real background, that it has to be hidden?   We knew all about Geo Bush 4 months before the elections.  He was a heavy drinker, now doesn't drink at all.  He was a fighter pilot in the National Guard, and the media portrayed that as a "draft dodger".  Then the media, when confronted with Bill Clinton dodging the draft, said that Bill was just a nice person.  Not to mention Rathergate.
 
What the h3ll is going on?  Can the media be any more obvious in their attempt to "protect" Obama's background and the real person? 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The price of gas in the US vs Europe

We see a lot of comparisons with the price of gas in the US vs Europe. 
 
In europe the biggest country is France or Spain.  And they have a lot of trains, busses, and subways for public transit.  It is easier to get around without a car, because the areas traveled are smaller in size.  That is europe.
 
In the US, people travel 30 miles to a job.  They travel 10 miles to a grocery store, a doctor or a hospital and there is no public transit.  The country is just too big.  We are dependent on our cars, for the necessity of life.
 
Sure in NY City that might not be the case.  I heard a person on FOX on Saturday saying that we should increase the price of gas to conserve.  She said that she walks to work.  She lives in New York City. 
 
Would she be willing to walk 20 miles to work every day, if she lived in Tennessee, Ohio, Indiana, Missouri, Kansas, Mississippi?   The people on the east and west coast don't understand the size of the US.  They view the US as a taxi ride to everywhere. 
 
Comparing the price of gas in the US vs Europe, is dumb.  Thinking that all of our lives and families exist as they do on NYC and LA, is equally dumb.  If these people are going to be permitted to talk on TV, they could at least be asked to understand the entire country, not just those small areas of NYC and LA.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What are they really saying?

This political season is more confusing than ever.  We have McCain telling us that he will not mention the negatives of his opponents.  And some of those negatives can easily sway the election.  Perhaps his plan to is to call attention to the problem, by refusing to call attention to the problem.
 
Then we have Obama, calling for open discussion on race.  Then, if anyone attempts any kind of open discussion, that does not support Obama, it is immediately tagged as "racist".   Maybe Obama had in mind to give the impression that he wanted open discussions on race, while knowing full well, that the leftist media would never permit that to happen.  They like it just the way it is now; one sided.
 
And the sad part is that Hillary looks pretty good, as a candidate, compared to Obama.  I never thought that I would see it that way.
 
I know, I sound paranoid.  Or, maybe I am just learning political speak.  You know, no matter what they say, they mean something different.
 
The leftist media is going to aggressively protect Obama.  Hopefully, the conservatives will let us see the real person, not the package that the leftist media is trying to sell us.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »